Search for: "General Motors Corp. v. Pennsylvania"
Results 1 - 20
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm
General Motors Corp., 111 N.J. 238, 544 A.2d 357 (1988) (holding that a strict liability claim against General Motors for an unreasonably dangerous product defect was subject to apportionment for contribution from failing to wear a seat belt) (the jury’s right to apportion furthered the public policy of properly allocating the costs of accidents and injuries). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 8:04 am
General Motors Corp., 906 F. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:43 pm
A unanimous en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court has held the issuance of Service Bulletins does not toll or restart the clock for calculating the statute of repose found in the federal General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1994. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
In Roverano v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Yamaha Motor Corp.) there wouldn’t be a question of the applicable law. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:15 pm
AK Steel Corp., 81 A.3d 851 (Pa. 2013). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
The sweeping interpretation that a state court gave to a routine registration statute and an accompanying power of attorney that Pennsylvania Fire credited as a general “consent” has yielded to the doctrinal refinement reflected in [Bauman] and the Court’s 21st century approach to general and specific jurisdiction.Id. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Dec. 3, 2014).Pennsylvania: Montoney v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
General Motors Corp., 676 A.2d 253, 255 n.1 (Pa. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 9:15 am
General Motors Corp. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 944 F. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
. in Hahn v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136, 143-44 (3d Cir. 2000); Wolfe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
General Motors Corp., 65 P.3d 956, 968-69 (Ariz. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., ___ F. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:41 am
(quoting Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
Pneumo Abex: Not Every Asbestos Exposure Is “Substantial” at Litigation & Trial Lawyer Blog.Last week the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided Betz v. [read post]
