Search for: "General Motors Corp. v. Pennsylvania" Results 41 - 60 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
General Motors Corp., a 1968 case in which a plaintiff suffered severe injuries when the steering column in his Chevrolet Corvair thrust backwards during a head-on collision, striking him in the head. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Ford Motor Co., 234 F.3d 136, 143-44 (3d Cir. 2000); Wolfe v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Pneumo Abex: Not Every Asbestos Exposure Is “Substantial” at Litigation & Trial Lawyer Blog.Last week the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided Betz v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:05 pm by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 949 F.Supp. 843 (N.D.Ga.1996)).This part of Mims almost makes up for the rest of it. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by Kevin F. Brady
  The District Court Decision and the Award of Costs In September of 2007, Race Tires (RTA), a tire supplier, sued Hoosier Racing Tire Corp. and Dirt Motor Sports, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
General Motors Corp., 2009 WL 1034487 (Del.Super. 2009) Benzene Knight v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Bexis
  After reviewing the evidence . . . we hold the evidence of conscious indifference is not legally sufficient.General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:26 am by Brenda Fulmer
Currently, there are several other noteworthy pending MDL proceedings in the district courts in Kentucky: ClassicStar Mare Lease Litigation (MDL No. 1877); Yamaha Motor Corp. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
General Motors, 2011 WL 52559, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
Corp., 21 No. 40 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 5, Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage July 15, 2011The Justice Department alleges in a Pennsylvania federal court lawsuit that Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. discriminates against women who are on maternity leave by refusing to insure their mortgages. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
  (IP Osgoode) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Second District Court declares Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute unconstitutional: Rogers v. [read post]