Search for: "Georgia Public Service Commission v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Slip at 4, citing United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
A-12-CV-166-LY (Oct. 25, 2012)), and Georgia (Palmer v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
The challenge is to plead with reasonable particularity without actually disclosing the secrets in a public document. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
The challenge is to plead with reasonable particularity without actually disclosing the secrets in a public document. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
Electrical Services, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:33 am
The Supreme Court has granted the FTC’s petition challenging a hospital merger in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
San Quentin State Prison 40 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court decided Furman v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
January 24, 2012)(insurer was relieved of any duty to defend TCPA claims against its insured by reason of an exclusion in its policy for claims arising out of or relating to "actual or alleged violation of United States Federal Communications Commission rules, regulations, interpretations, policies, statutes, laws or codes"). [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:27 pm
January 24, 2012)(insurer was relieved of any duty to defend TCPA claims against its insured by reason of an exclusion in its policy for claims arising out of or relating to "actual or alleged violation of United States Federal Communications Commission rules, regulations, interpretations, policies, statutes, laws or codes"). [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:30 am
” US v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Breyer, Energy Regulation by the Federal Power Commission (1974) Yet other works that caught my attention, for various reasons, include the following works: William H. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
The federal court filing comes after the US International Trade Commission (ITC) issued an early ruling that Motorola had not infringed the patents at dispute in an ITC claim brought by Apple. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
On the federal front, the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
State Department's Diplomatic Security Service. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
State Department's Diplomatic Security Service. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:50 am
The case is Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:27 pm
Brief of the United States, U.S. v. [read post]
