Search for: "Goodwin v. Employment Division"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
Noting that the Commissioner of Education, in his ruling in an appeal** filed with Commissioner by DeOliveira, determined that Goodwin and Murphy should have been included in the elementary education tenure area for the purpose of layoffs, the Appellate Division said that “there is no evidence that the decision not to do so was motivated by animus toward petitioner or favoritism toward Goodwin and Murphy. [read post]
Court Upholds New Jersey Law Prohibiting Job Ads Requiring Job Applicants Who Are Currently Employed
30 Jan 2014, 4:45 am
Goodwin's right to free speech. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:56 am
Case Background and Circuit Split In Smiley v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 5:30 pm
Court Dismisses CFAA, ECPA, and Other Claims in Privacy Class Action Opperman v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Schepers, “The Biological Action of Talc and Other Silicate Minerals,” in Goodwin, Proceedings on the Symposium on Talc; U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 8:03 am
See Wheby v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
Chow) see here (noting "Our colleagues in Division Four recently underlined how important it is for every judge to combat gender bias in the justice system. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Goodwin Procter LLP. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:34 am
Harper, who represented the plaintiffs in the American Indian trust funds lawsuit, Cobell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
He has also written several opinions reflecting hostility to reproductive rights, and he has ruled in favor of employers in a number of employment discrimination cases. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144 (involving a First Amendment challenge to license plate restrictions), and Bullard v. [read post]
