Search for: "HOLMES v. ALEXANDER"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
In a 2007 dissent in James v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 8:15 am
Hollis v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
It is an act for which he or she is accountable under the Constitution: As Justice Holmes stated almost a century ago in Biddle v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm
Holmes), Nick Bunker’s An Empire on the Edge: How Britain Came to Fight America (review by proud Rhode Islander Neysa M. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
What about Oliver Wendell Holmes’s editing of Kent’s Commentaries on American Law (12th ed., 1873)? [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Alexander Tsoutsanis. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:47 am
Among Thayer’s most noted followers, Posner includes Justices Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, and Felix Frankfurter along with Supreme Court scholar Alexander Bickel. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Randy Barnett and Jeff Rosen have recognized, the Chief Justice’s tax-power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Supreme Court, March 03, 2008 Boulware v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Holmes offers a rule: The driver must stop and look. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
(On that point, I can’t help but detect the palimpsestic residue of the two great thinkers about judicial institutions who were initially assigned the Taft volume of the Holmes Devise but prevented by their untimely deaths from completing it—Alexander Bickel and Robert Cover.) [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
” It is the only part of the N&P Clause quoted by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 33 and by James Madison in his initial remarks to the first Congress on the need for a Bill of Rights. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
In Flood v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Popular sovereignty meant, as Holmes argued, that even "tyrannical" laws should be upheld if they represented the wishes of legislative majorities. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019). [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Rev. 55 (1963). 16 446 John Hart Ely, The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
Texas v. [read post]
