Search for: "Han Holding, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court ruled 5-4 in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:00 pm by The CGCP Team
China Law Connect (Issue 4) cover and The Tidings of Spring |《中国法律连接》(第4期)封面与《春讯》This newsletter covers: Six Belt & Road Guiding Cases and AmCham Talk The CGCP’s Global Impact China Law Connect (Issue 4): Judicial Mediation, Regulating AI, and AI and Courts A Grant from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation & How to Purchase China Law… [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
CSX Transp., Inc., 2009 WL 3766056, 2009 U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
" (quoting In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc. 122 USPQ2d 1796, 1799 (TTAB 2017).The Board further distinguished cases such as In re Weather Channel, Inc., 229 USPQ 854 (TTAB 1986), in which the Board found THE WEATHER CHANNEL to be generic for “a television transmission whose subject matter exclusively concerns the weather because viewers would understand that term as the apt descriptive name for television channel dedicated to the weather. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am by Schachtman
The November 2018 issue of the American Bar Association Journal (ABAJ) featured an exposé-style article on the hazards of our chemical environment, worthy of Mother Jones, or the International Journal of Health Nostrums, by a lawyer, Alan Bell.1Alan Bell, according to his website, is a self-described “environmental health warrior. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Luning, 133 U.S. 529, 10 S.Ct. 363, 33 L.Ed. 766 (1890) (holding that Nevada counties are not immune under the Eleventh Amendment); see also Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:37 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
American Health, Inc., Socios Mayores en Salud, Inc., y Socios Mayores en Salud Holding, Inc. demandaron al Dr. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
"]In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc., 122 USPQ2d 1796 (TTAB 2017) [TTABlogged here]. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Nonetheless, because this case was commenced under the old rules, the current dispute arose during the transition to the new rules, and the dispute involves a scheduling matter, the Board exercised its discretion to reopen discovery for the limited purpose of allowing respondent time to respond to petitioner’s (tardy) written discovery requests.In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc., 122 USPQ2d 1796 (TTAB 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by Schachtman
This holding took the legal significance out of the statistical insignificance of Campion’s comparison 40+ versus <40 age-group termination rates. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2002) (quoting Han Beauty, Inc. v.Alberto–Culver Co., 236 F.3d 1333, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:29 am
" In re United Trademark Holdings, Inc., Serial No. 86836082 (June 13, 2017) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Bergsman). [read post]