Search for: "Harding v. Industrial Comm."
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
During the Bush years, the tech industry was viewed much like the A/V club in the eyes of the football team – they didn't get them and therefore largely ignored them. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:20 am
Huawei and ZTE v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:38 am
”) (citing Brookfield Comm'ns, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
Subcomm. on Intellectual Property and Judicial Administration of the Comm. on the Judiciary on H.R. 2372, 101st Cong. (1991). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:23 am
Corbett v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
Exchange Comm. v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Last week, I addressed two papers from a symposium organized by the litigation industry to applaud the First Circuit’s decision in Milward v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
A person disqualified from membership would be prohibited from participation in the securities industry. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:59 pm
Radar Industries, Inc., 184 N.W.2d 289 (Mich. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 11:27 am
In Viacom Int'l v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
I continue to believe that legislative protection is the only hope for the long-term survival of the industry niche. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
McEwen* Introduction The American Invents Act is a result of pressures from diverse industries and groups. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
"8 Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
”[1] What I found when I started trying cases was that many states had hard rules on expert witnesses, but soft judges. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm
Int’l Trade Comm’n, 180 F.3d1354, 1366 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Commc’n Comm’n, 825 F.3d 674, 698 (D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Answering that question is hard, not just because the evidence we have about the efficacy of IP rights in encouraging innovation is mixed at best. [8] It is also hard because sometimes – often, in fact – it is competition, not regulation, that drives innovation. [9] So sometimes creating or strengthening an IP regime can be counterproductive, not only raising prices but stifling the very innovation it was supposed to encourage. [read post]
