Search for: "Harris v. Louisiana State Supreme Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
Louisiana, he returns to the Supreme Court challenging both holdings. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm
Yesterday, the Louisiana case Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
Prosecutors have an obligation under a nearly 50-year-old Supreme Court precedent in Brady v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 3:34 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Harris Funeral Homes, a case in which the Supreme Court may decide the issue of whether Title VII covers transgender employees. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
In “How to Save the Supreme Court,” Sitaraman and Epps propose expanding the Supreme Court to 15 justices. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:21 pm
Smith’s challenges were turned aside by Louisiana courts, with the state Supreme Court refusing review in September of last year. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
The case is Harris v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
Louisiana, the court overturned Apodaca v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
Louisiana, holding that the Court’s 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
Supreme Court asking the Court to grant the Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed last month by a group of drug purchasers in Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., et al., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The petitioner appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which denied review without providing any reasons for the denial. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am
Louisiana, in which the Court is considering whether its 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am
Brady rights are named after the Supreme Court's Brady v. [read post]
