Search for: "Hoffman LaRoche, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 9:43 pm by Patent Docs
In the Sandoz complaint, it alleged that two Hoffman-LaRoche patents created a "cloud of legal uncertainty" over its drug product, and that it was entitled to a determination that the two patents were not infringed, invalid, and unenforceable. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 949 F.2d 806, 814 (5th Cir. 1992) (applying Mississippi law), which you can find later in this post.What happens when a heeding presumption is imposed concerning a risk warning? [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Roche Laboratories, Division of Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 684 P.2d 1187, 1189 (N.M. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hoffman-LaRoche and Genentech cases on BonivaHoffman-LaRoche lost its appeal at the CAFC:Plaintiff Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., (“Roche”) appealsfrom the decision of the United States District Court forthe District of New Jersey granting the defendant genericdrug companies summary judgment of invalidity as toclaims 1-8 of U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:49 pm
Jurors in a state court have awarded Kamie Kendall Rees $1,587,928 in her Accutane injury lawsuit against drug maker Hoffman La Roche Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
            We watched some of the recently concluded Winter Olympics. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:02 am
Hoffman-LaRoche, No. 13-5051 JSC, slip op. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 2010 WL 3034453, at *22 (N.J. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Thus, the Supreme Court seems poised to closely analyze the distinctions between collective and class actions for the first time since its 1989 decision in Hoffman-LaRoche Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Thus, the Supreme Court seems poised to closely analyze the distinctions between collective and class actions for the first time since its 1989 decision in Hoffman-LaRoche Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:39 pm
The drug maker, Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., appealed the judgment claiming that Kendall missed her statute of limitations, which is two years in New Jersey. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:39 pm
The drug maker, Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., appealed the judgment claiming that Kendall missed her statute of limitations, which is two years in New Jersey. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:26 am
Hoffman-LaRoche Inc., Kamie Kendall alleged that Accutane’s manufacturer, Hoffman, was responsible for failing to warn her of the risk of ulcerative colitis, which she developed at the age of 14 after taking Accutane. [read post]