Search for: "Hughes v. Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The right to a disciplinary hearing may survive the individual’s resignation or retirement from the position Hughes v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Frank Adams v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
Rory Thomson, a senior associate in the Insurance and Reinsurance Group at CMS, previews the appeal pending in the case of Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (a firm). [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge unanimously allowed the appeals by consent. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 3:04 am
Lord Hughes gave the only judgment, with which the other Justices agreed. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 7:40 am
LEXIS 166274, Nov. 17, 2015) and allowed an inmate to move ahead on his complaint that the prison warden is not properly implementing the Department of Corrections grooming policy that allows a prisoner to wear a beard where required by the inmate's sincerely held religious belief.In Isaac v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
The Court went on to point out that, at the time of publication, conviction data was posted on the Department of Corrections’ website. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 11:40 am
From Laviage v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
The Supreme Court Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hughes, Lloyd-Jones and Lady Black allowed the appeal. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Since statute is silent and Parliament has not defined the meaning of “precarious”, Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hughes, Lloyd-Jones and Lady Black heard rival arguments about the correct construction of the term within the meaning of the Strasbourg jurisprudence. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:04 pm
by Dennis Crouch Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Prince George's County Department of Corrections, 2018 U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 1:06 am
Thepanel departs from these requirements. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
David Wingfield, a partner with Canadian class action law firm Strosberg, Sasso, Sutts LLP, former head of the competition law division of the Canadian Department of Justice and an English-qualified barrister, has commented: “It will be interesting to read the Supreme Court’s ruling, and how it interprets the relationship between the UK competition class action procedure and Canadian class action law. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
No unfairness was caused to Iqbal by a perceived failure to notify him of the defect in time for him to take corrective action. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:18 am
Sounds like they were not exercising diligence sailing in these waters without a pilot or correct charts. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
Following on from the Case Preview (here), the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Arnold v Britton & Ors on 10 June 2015 in which the appellants’ appeal was dismissed by a majority of 4-1. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
In short, the literal application of the clause was not sufficiently unbusinesslike to justify the court departing from it. [read post]
