Search for: "Humphrey's Executor v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2014, 9:30 pm
Moreover, our approach undermines enduring dicta in Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:15 am
United States). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
United States, 295 U. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
This modest slap on the wrist is strong evidence that the current conservative Justices will not take on the constitutional status of independent agencies, which were accepted in Humphrey’s Executor v, United States (1935), even though these could be challenged on the ground that the so-called “fourth branch” of government does not fit into the tripartite constitutional structure with its legislative, executive, and judicial branches. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
But consider the range of national and state legislation and presidential action the Court held unconstitutional in one 17-month period starting in January, 1935: the NIRA, both its Codes of Fair Competition and the president's power to control the flow of contraband oil across state lines; the Railroad Retirement Act; the Frazier-Lemke Farm Mortgage Moratorium Act; the effort of the president to get the administrative agencies to reflect his political vision… [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
The second was Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:03 pm
United States and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
So, with all of that background, we return to FEF v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:08 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which was decided by the United States Supreme Court today. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
” Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm
For example, he explained: “So you have got ‘for cause’ squared, and that’s – that’s a significant limitation that Humphrey’s Executor didn’t recognize and Morrison didn’t recognize. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
Then, and only then, would “Humphrey’s Executor squared” be truly presented to the Court for its review. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:08 am
" Freytag v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
See Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Carvin of Jones Day in Washington (30 minutes), for the United States will be Solicitor General Elena Kagan (20 minutes), and for the Board will be Jeffrey A. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
United States (sustaining independent regulatory commissions) and Morrison v. [read post]
