Search for: "Humphrey v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 11:15 am
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:35 am
In the recent decision of Humphrey v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Martin, Kathleen and Humphrey's son is at Oxford. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
Humphreys, ___ N.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
Casto’s article “Dear Sister Antillico…”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
Humphrey’s article Two-Stepping Around a Minor’s Constitutional Right to Abortion is cited in the following article: Lisa V. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
Concurrence: One of these days we should resolve what, if anything, is left of Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
" The Washington Post reports that a state sponsor of terrorism is already attempting to obtain these guns. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:08 am
" Freytag v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
Please email Sal Humphreys at s.humphreys@qut.edu.au to register for the event. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
