Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 2 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 121 - 140 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Kozeny, No. 073107 Grant of motion to dismiss all but false statement charges related to violation of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is affirmed where the plain language of 18 U.S.C. section 3292, and the structure and content of the law by which it was enacted, require the government to apply for a suspension of the running of the statute of limitations before the limitations period expires. . [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:48 pm by Michael Lowe
Under federal law, the amount of time required for registration on a Sex Offender Registry is less time than under Texas law 2. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Students are discouraged from attending because they’re told all the tickets have been distributed already, and general community members are barred from showing up because only a few students/faculty/staff are there, and the 70-30 rule kicks in. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Verrilli, Jr., presented the government’s argument, starting with the question of whether Congress had (1) established a term of zero or (2) not established a term at all for restored works, obviously arguing for the latter. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 And that means recognizing that the most effective and sustainable instruments are ones that are constrained and guided by our core values, including the rule of law. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:16 am by Katherine McCoy
Defendants in such cases could avoid additional cleanup responsibility by operation of law as well as doctrines of res judicata and issue preclusion. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm by Barry Sookman
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Rule 2 of Order XXA provides that award of costs under this Rule shall be in accordance with such rules as the High Court may make in this behalf. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
But for our clients, advocacy in this area of the law may be the most important thing we can do for them. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States Election Assistance Commission 14-1164Issue: (1) Whether Article I, Section 2 and the Seventeenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]