Search for: "IN RE BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. "
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- In a dissent from the Federal Circuit's affirmance of a Board determination of obviousness, Judge Newman raises a jurisdictional and separation-of-powers argument in In re Baxter International, Inc. that is destined to be decided by the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:37 am
Baxter appealed an obviousness finding from a re-examination proceeding. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
” (internal citations omitted)). [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:56 am
Highlights this week included: CAFC: Judge Newman again questions the constitutionality of “do over” patent reexamination: In re Baxter International, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (WHDA) (Inventive Step) (Patent Docs) Please join the discussion [...] [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:14 am
Ex Parte Baxter International, Inc., No. 2009-006493 (18 March 2010) (informative opinion)Baxter and Fresenius engaged in a hard-fought battle over patents relating to hemodialysis machines with touch screen user/machine interfaces. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 6:41 pm
Serious injury and death have been reported caused by Baxter International's defective Colleague infusion pumps. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:36 am
In In re Baxter International Inc. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
See In re GPAC, Inc., 57 F.3d1573, 1580 (Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:08 am
October 13, 022 - 2 PM (In Person): In re Baxter S.r.l., Serial No. 90172106 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark BAXTER for carpets and rugs, excluding bath mats and for related retail store services, in view of the registered mark CHASING BAXTER for bath mats.] [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:46 am
Cir. 1985)(emphases in original); see In re Applied Materials, Inc.,692 F.3d 1289, 1298 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:50 pm
See In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 390 (Fed. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:59 pm
In re Baxter International (CAFC 2011-1073) precedential; en banc, per curiam In this matter, a patent held valid in litigation is still subject to reexamination. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:07 am
SRI International, Inc., No. 21-1267. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
In re ePlus, Inc., 540 Fed App’x 998 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm
Interface Architectural Res. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:30 pm
The holding in Fresenius II was a bit more controversial that In re Baxter (given recent cases like In re Construction Equipment). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
Syntura International, Inc., No. 10-1487, slip op. (4th Cir. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Picker International, Inc., 753 F.2d 670, 67 (8th Cir. 1985).Nebraska: Uribe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 12:33 pm
Cir. 2006)(quoting In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 392(Fed. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
Details: Ex parte Baxter International, Inc. [read post]
