Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF B.B., A CHILD" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 8:17 am by Kate Fort
Although B.B. and A.T.H. never married, the bifurcation principle of Kelly nevertheless applies in this case because multiple parties and jurisdictions are involved and each has an interest in the outcome of the proceedings. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 3:50 pm
The two women would be the primary caregivers of the child, but they believed it would be in the child's best interests that B.B. remain involved in the child's life. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:50 am
Privacy fans will take great interest in this decision, which involved a minor girl's appeal from her delinquency adjudication for producing, directing, or promoting a video including sexual conduct of a child. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 8:00 am by Francesca Blackard
In that case, the Texas Supreme Court held there is a presumption embedded in the child’s best interest that a fit parent determines whether a nonparent should be allowed conservatorship or possession of a child. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 8:00 am by Francesca Blackard
In that case, the Texas Supreme Court held there is a presumption embedded in the child’s best interest that a fit parent determines whether a nonparent should be allowed conservatorship or possession of a child. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
A mother's domicile in the Indian Child Welfare Act: In re adoption of B.B. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:18 am
Some more background: Under a 1995 ruling in a case called B.B. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am by Susan Brenner
  Wikipedia lists the hearsay exceptions, if you are interested. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:41 pm by Danielle & Andy
Lesson:  When an older child has a preference about whom he or she wants to live with, the child's wishes carry a lot of weight, but the judge ultimately will decide the issue based on the best interests of the child. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm by cdw
We also hold that it was not objectively unreasonable for the state court to conclude that Vasquez’s appellate counsel did not labor under an actual conflict of interest. [read post]