Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN F. FREEDMAN" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2019, 5:51 am
Smith, EY Center for Board Matters, on Friday, November 15, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, Disclosure, Diversity, ESG, Human capital, SEC, Securities regulation JV Directors Duty of Loyalty Posted by Meghan McGovern, Tracy Branding, and James Bamford, Water Street Partners LLC, on Saturday, November 16, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Conflicts of… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am by Will Baude
Recall that Stevens is arguing in defense of the total voting exclusion he wished to keep in the proposed amendment as section three, even though enforcing the voting ban would require implementing legislation concerning legislative apportionment, voter registration, and other such matters: The gentleman from Ohio [Mr. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
.'" ACLU executive director Steven Brown added: "The court's order requiring the removal of items from a website is a classic prior restraint that the First Amendment simply does not countenance. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Michal Freedman, and Leon Gordis, “Reference Guide on Epidemiology,” in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 549, 612 (Wash., DC 3d ed., 2011). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Eric Freedman, Richard Garnett, Seth Kreimer, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne, and James Weinstein, and my students Curtis Brown, Tess Curet, and Ali Vaqar worked on the brief. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:14 am by Schachtman
In the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, the authors of the epidemiology chapter advance instances of acceleration of onset of disease as an example of a situation in which reliance upon doubling of risk will not provide a reliable probability of causation calculation[1]. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]