Search for: "In Re: Rules Governing Admission to The Mississippi Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2019, 9:47 am
Petition to Amend the Rules Governing Admission to the Mississippi Bar: [T]he Board believes limiting the number of times applicants can retake the exam is appropriate and will better equip those repeatedly failing the test to pass it in the future and will eliminate a revolving door of re-takers that... [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Next up is bar admissions. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
University of Texas at Austin 14-981 Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit’s re-endorsement of the University of Texas at Austin’s use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions decisions can be sustained under this Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Fisher v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
Mississippi officials have asked the Court to decide whether all pre-viability abortion restrictions are unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:58 am
In re: Welding Fume Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1535 (N.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
On the other hand, members of the House of Representatives answer to the people of their district, and do so often, standing for re-election on short cycles (Art. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, 13-1496. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
” So we’re not dealing with a manufacturing defect claim. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
Mississippi, 14-10486, and Williams v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
You’re going to look like a bunch of jerks. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am
The government is now cracking down. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
" (Class actions are a little different and are governed by different rules. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
But since 1890, the majority explained, Mississippi voters had re-enacted the disenfranchisement provision twice – in 1950 and 1968 – and the challengers do not contend that the 1968 amendment was motivated by an intent to discriminate. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
12 May 2023, 12:54 pm
Last year both the Michigan Supreme Court and the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that their states' constitutions provide implied causes of action against government officials who violate state constitutional rights. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
Like the federal government, states play a critical role in responding to the novel coronavirus outbreak. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
Studies, whether they have statistically significant results, or not, are rarely admissible in evidence. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:56 am
The attendees are not charged admission or a per-plate fee. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
United States about what the governing rule is in cases involving plurality decisions. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am
The Phillips Court observed that a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling government interest even if it has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice. [read post]
