Search for: "In Re Advisory Opinion (Chief Justice)"
Results 21 - 40
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2017, 4:46 am
On June 21, 2017, the Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, Committee on Attorney Advertising, and Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law issued a Joint Opinion (ACPE Opinion 732, CAA Opinion 44, UPL Opinion 54) stating that the legal service program operated by Avvo through its website is an impermissible lawyer referral service, in violation of Rules of Professional Conduct 7.2(c) and 7.3(d), and comprises improper fee sharing… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Judges had not been consulted much, and certainly not polled directly for their opinions, as Judge Hervey proposes to do. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:41 pm
” Lord Justice Leveson replied: “I can only say to those who telephone your office and say ‘well we know what you’re like’, it’s far more nuanced than that. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:33 pm
Hearing arguments today in Washington, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia emerged as the industry's strongest defenders, questioning whether courts should second- guess the fund boards that approve the fees. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
Under these circumstances and given the strong policy considerations against issuing advisory opinions, the motion for summary judgment was denied for lack of ripeness.Breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm
The week in which Dame Sue Carr was sworn in as Lady Chief Justice of England & Wales… …and a week in which fact checkers have been working overtime to counter spurious claims on the impact of HS2 developments. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:43 pm
See Formal Advisory Opinion 2020-01. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Justice Stevens wrote the majority opinion for a unanimous Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Justice Elena Kagan, whose plurality opinion was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Sonia Sotomayor, cautioned the Court to exercise “wisdom and humility” in reviewing necessary government programs and noted that “if SORNA’s delegation is unconstitutional, then most of government is unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:48 pm
In re: Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re: Use of Marijuana for Certain Medical Conditions (SC13-2006). [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court, the justices at first deadlocked, 4-4. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 11:04 am
” Given the dialogue, Chief Justice Roberts suggested a potential solution: “We are having an elaborate discussion about whether or not this was a claim that was waived below. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
However, in 1793 the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Jay, refused to issue an advisory opinion in response to twenty-nine questions submitted by the Cabinet of George Washington. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:40 pm
The 5-4 decision sparked a rousing dissent by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:04 am
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. joined the liberals on the court in upholding the mandate, deciding the penalty for not carrying insurance is a tax and therefore falls within Congress' taxing power. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:31 am
So they decided a word limit would better discourage verbiage.A judicial advisory committee made up of judges, lawyers and law professors selected by Chief Justice John Roberts now says that page-to-word conversion miscalculated how many words were in an average 50-page brief. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
First, the New Chief apparently disagrees with the view of his mentor (the Old Chief) that Apprendi is made up out of whole cloth (which Justices criticize when others do it). [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
From some quick research, the root seems to be in a case written by Chief Justice Shepard in 1999, Sensback v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
In any event, the Advisory Committee’s example of an “accidentologist” seemed to imply a requirement of trustworthiness, which might apply to both admissible and inadmissible &ld [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JUSTICE GUZMAN filed a concurring opinion, in which JUSTICE LEHRMANN and JUSTICE DEVINE joined. [read post]
