Search for: "In Re E.i. Du Pont" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2016, 6:00 am by Jared Firestone
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. stemmed from a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) that began in 2001. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:00 am by Jared Firestone
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. stemmed from a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) that began in 2001. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Guest Blogger
There are thirteen du Pont Factors derived from In re E. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:02 am by Sean Wajert
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 719, 2009 (Del. 7/11/11). [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:20 am by David Lilenfeld
The test used in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & C0., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973) evaluates not whether the trademarks can be distinguished in a side-by-side comparison, but rather whether as a whole their commercial impressions are so similar that confusion is likely. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:39 pm
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.), No. 07-2105 (4th Cir. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:02 pm by Alexa Silverman
Burberry seeks to protect itself from trademark confusion, as expressed in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).  [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm by Rajiv Kr. Choudhry
DU PONT  Granted Dr.Rajesh Dixit 1201/DEL/1999 ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE Granted 3(d) S.K.Roy 1143/MUMNP/2007 ID BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION Refused Dr. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am by James Hastings
   In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am by James Hastings
   In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm by Nikki Siesel
A likelihood of confusion analysis will consider all relevant facts in evidence and the factors set forth in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1976). [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 1:16 pm by Nikki Siesel
The Board relied on the factors in In re E.I. du Pont Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973), and analyzed the probative facts in the record. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
E.I. du Pont De Nemours & Co., 750 F.2d 1569, 1580 (Fed. [read post]