Search for: "In Re E.i. Du Pont"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
Under U.S. trademark law and court precedent, determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion involves weighing a number of factors (13 factors to be exact), known as the “Dupont factors,” set out in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
15 May 2008, 7:42 am
E.I. du Pont v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:54 pm
I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:55 am
Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:15 am
Under U.S. trademark law and court precedent, determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion involves weighing a number of factors (13 factors to be exact), known as the “Dupont factors,” set out in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:18 pm
One to watch is E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:00 am
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 636 F.3d 88 (4th Cir. 2011). [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:02 am
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., No. 719, 2009 (Del. 7/11/11). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
See, IN RE: E.I. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 844 F. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:46 pm
” E.I. du Pont, 904 F.3d at 1008. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:39 pm
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.), No. 07-2105 (4th Cir. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:02 pm
Burberry seeks to protect itself from trademark confusion, as expressed in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
Du Pont de Nemours and Co., No. 08-0625 (Tex. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:52 pm
The board cited E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am
In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:46 am
In cases where it is alleged that the Applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the Opposer’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will look to the factors for likelihood of confusion set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm
A likelihood of confusion analysis will consider all relevant facts in evidence and the factors set forth in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1976). [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 1:16 pm
The Board relied on the factors in In re E.I. du Pont Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973), and analyzed the probative facts in the record. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:40 pm
In the end, when applying the analysis set forth in the controlling precedent of In re E.I. du pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973), the factors weighed in favor of the Applicant. [read post]
