Search for: "In Re Eisenberg"
Results 41 - 60
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
It's had some illustrious authors, including Zechariah Chafee, Sidney Post Simpson, Edward Re, Ted Eisenberg, and Emily Sherwin. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:56 am
"Whether we're rated highly or poorly, this survey is not a valid measure of the efficiency or fairness of Louisiana's courts. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:54 pm
They’re not in here today but, more information on their approach, be sure to check out Zosha’s LXBN Leaders profile on them. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am
In In re Pfizer Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 9:46 pm
" In re Cadillac, supra, 93 N.J. at 425. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
False convictions are by definition "legal" until they're overturned by the appellate courts. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:19 pm
Earlier today, Malibu filed suit against Lipscomb and his firm, Lipscomb, Eisenberg & Baker, in federal court. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:57 pm
"There's a secret filing owning up to an inaccuracy," Eisenberg says. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:48 am
Res. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 10:15 am
Eisenberg, Can Patents Deter Innovation? [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:54 am
For now, I want to highlight some of Kapczynski's fascinating observations on the evolving field of "IP law" – which, her comments suggest, may have to be re-named.According to Kapcynski, IP law has undergone a paradigm shift of late, as scholars begin to turn away from IP as the exclusive form of incentive to innovate, and to take note of the spaces in which innovation occurs absent IP and absent traditional incentives. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 pm
Although this is the third edition since Emily (with Ted Eisenberg and Joseph Re) revived the book and gave it its current name, the book has a much longer history–it goes back to materials on equity put together by James Barr Ames in 1904. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:21 am
Res. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:21 pm
'" Eisenberg wrote. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:03 am
The man was re-listed in July 2006 when he returned to UC San Francisco. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Eisenberg tried to get U.S. [read post]
3 May 2007, 5:54 am
First of all, the policies...they're not proscriptive policies. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
" So, the moral of this tale, is that if you go into the case, not wanting to make any decisions, you may need to re-evaluate, but, if you are ready to make tough choices - you will be ready to go! [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:59 pm
Pizer and her co-counsel, including Oakland appellate specialist Jon Eisenberg, contend in the brief filed Monday that last Thursday's ruling in In re Marriage Cases, 08 C.D.O.S. 5820, makes it clear that gays and lesbians are citizens with constitutional rights and, by extension, cannot be denied essential medical services, including infertility care. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
Well, fortunately enough, the Jewish environmentalist literature has gotten better over the last several years, and here are a couple you can sneak into the sanctuary without feeling guilty (an important side benefit if you’re Jewish). [read post]
