Search for: "In Re Frye"
Results 61 - 80
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2018, 3:25 pm
Texas' junk science writ continues to impact high-profile capital cases, this time causing re-evaluation of faddish "shaken-baby" science, which in recent years has come under fire. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 2:51 pm
" Other IP scholars in attendance include Bryan Frye (Kentucky), whose paper The Ballad of Harry James Tompkins provides a riveting, surprising, and (I think) convincing re-telling of the Erie story, and Megan LaBelle (Catholic University of America), whose paper discusses the crucial issue of whether the Erie line of cases directs federal courts sitting in diversity to apply state privilege law. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:59 am
In Re Accutane Litigation, Nos. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am
In re Accutane Litig., 451 N.J. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:26 pm
It’s an organization that receives millions of dollars from deep-pocketed CEOs and others with business interests who want to make it harder for you collect damages if you’re seriously hurt. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Several years ago, Florida lawmakers decided to enact a measure that would alter F.S. 90.702 (testimony by experts) and F.S. 90.704 (basis of opinion testimony by experts), forgoing the so-called “Frye standard” (so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 8:13 pm
There is a posting of a video related to questioning of (now withdrawn) judicial candidate Matthew Petersen.One of the exchanges:Senator KENNEDY: As a trial judge, you’re obviously going to have witnesses. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
We don’t want to be here again, but if we must, we’re going to stay together and support each other. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:24 am
Does the word “trespass” cease to apply if you’re sufficiently righteous? [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 10:27 pm
Frye, Christopher J. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:12 am
” I would add that they’re not repulsive or Stalin-esque either.Next is Brian Frye (who will be the first scholar-in-residence once we open the Hall of Fame):“[T]he AAM and AAMD tacitly admit that there is no legal prohibition on museums selling artworks and using the proceeds for anything they like. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm
See “Demonstration of Frye Gatekeeping in Pennsylvania Birth Defects Case” (Oct. 6, 2015); In re Zoloft Prod. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:10 am
That’s not to say “Frye” is a free-for-all, by any means. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
See In re Amends. to the Fla. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
("We're used to it," he said.) [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 5:10 am
This is a well-known thing, and most judges stay abreast of basic developments in science because they’re deeply concerned with what passes Daubert, even if their only interest in Frye is that it tastes good. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In re TC Heartland, LLC, No. 2016-105, at 10 (Fed. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
Mahle, The “Pure Opinion” Exception to the Florida Frye Standard, Fla. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:30 pm
., In re Denture Cream Prods. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 5:58 am
You’re allowed to make money. [read post]
