Search for: "In Re Frye"
Results 81 - 100
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Litigation is likely to arise from disputes at school and work, and from the intersection of state-provided benefits and entitlements.Long before Caityin Jenner [in Vanity Fair] and Laverne Cox [in Orange is the New Black] re-branded the transgender lifestyle, Judge Frye was out there on the front lines being active for her cause, and paying the price. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 7:23 am
Via re-analysis of the Rand study of 2001 which examined effects of Daubert, this research further highlights the scientific/mathematical illiteracy of the current legal community (especially, as I demonstrate, compared to judges pre-Frye). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
Frye v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 8:16 am
On the other hand, Illinois and a few other states use the Frye standard to decide these crucial, threshold questions in court. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 8:16 am
On the other hand, Illinois and a few other states use the Frye standard to decide these crucial, threshold questions in court. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:55 am
Ex parte Frye, 94 USPQ2d 1072, 1075 (BPAI 2010)(precedential)(citing In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445(Fed. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Starrs, “Frye v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 5:57 pm
I didn’t say it at the time, but where I come from, if you working for free, I think you’re called a volunteer. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 1:42 pm
There are times — and again, they’re few and far between — in which a driver just doesn’t know that they’ve hit someone. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:54 am
Joiner for Admissibility of Expert Testimony,” 1 Res Communes 65 (1999). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:08 am
If you’re representing a trustee or personal representative, this question gets complicated by the web of fiduciary duties underlying trusts and estates generally. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm
In In re Accutane Litigation, 2015 WL 753674 (N. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Frye (Univ. of Kentucky College of Law) William T. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
Ex parte Frye, 94 USPQ2d 1072, 1075 (BPAI 2010)(precedential)(citing In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445 (Fed. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:44 am
We’re running out of room, so pretty soon I’ll be putting all new speaking requests on a waitlist. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
The recent opinion piece by Kevin Elliott and David Resnik exemplifies a rhetorical strategy that idealizes and elevates a burden of proof in science, and then declares it is different from legal and regulatory burdens of proof. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
You know you’re in trouble when a court begins its admissibility discussion by claiming that “Daubert and Rule 702 thus greatly liberalized what had been the strict Frye standards for admission of expert scientific testimony. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:04 am
” After all, we’re the gatekeepers. [read post]
