Search for: "In Re M.d. Construction" Results 61 - 80 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2014, 9:09 am by RatnerPrestia
When defending a term of degree, patentees may point to In re Maxim Integrated Prods. to frame an argument that Nautilus did not address terms of degree directly and then explain why the claim language on its face favors a particular claim construction. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:49 am by Bexis
  Regardless, the real problem with plaintiff’s warnings case was that they relied on a single expert, our old friend, Lemuel Moye, M.D., Ph.D., to establish the inadequacy of warnings and he never articulated what different warnings as to a risk of bleeding should have said. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We have to think that asbestos plaintiffs are going to have a field day with Weeks – more, perhaps, than even generic plaintiffs, since the learned intermediary rule still applies to prescription drug cases.Anyway, we could go through each of these policy considerations at length, but we’re not going to. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
Rost CVm Peter Rost, M.D. is a former Vice President, Marketing for the drug company Pfizer.Prior to his work for Pfizer, Dr. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., 1998 WL 812318, at *23 (M.D. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
Supp.2d ___, 2012 WL 1058870, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by WIMS
Rizzo, M.D., Chair, Board of Directors of the American Lung Association said, "? [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Peter Rost
Rost CVm Peter Rost, M.D. is a former Vice President, Marketing for the drug company Pfizer.Prior to his work for Pfizer, Dr. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731, 736-37 (Fed. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Last week, a federal bankruptcy court in Alabama handed down In re Dorsey, 2011 Google Scholar 4392011633671183587 (M.D. [read post]