Search for: "In Re New Center Hosp." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Unfortunately, when negotiations between the parties break down, letters of intent are often at the center of litigation.[2] In perhaps the most famous example of litigation around the enforceability of a letter of intent, Pennzoil won a judgment against Texaco for $10.5 billion, and Texaco was forced to seek bankruptcy protection.[3] Despite the legal risks, companies continue to use letters of intent. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Hosp., 850 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2017) because that case also presented a question over whether an action for discrimination based on sexual orientation under Title VII can be brought. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
In February, he re-posted a video and numerous Facebook comments originally posted to the web by Hopkinton resident Kathryn Narcisi. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
D/B/A McALLEN MEDICAL CENTER AND SOUTH TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEMS, Petitioners,v.YOLANDA LOPEZ, SHERYL HAMER, ELMER DEGUZMAN AND RICHARD WECKER, Respondents.No. 17-0733.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued March 12, 2019.Opinion delivered: May 17, 2019. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
 Houle provides an example of a credit card collection case in which the defendant had countered the bank’s motion for summary judgment with an affidavit of his own, but it did him no good because both the trial court and the court of appeals denied the counter-affidavit the effect of creating a fact issue precluding summary judgment.Controverting Summary Judgment Affidavit of Defendant Robert Houledisputing authenticity of records, legitimacy of interest rate, and correctness of… [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you’re looking for a $25 grill, nobody cares it’s called Backyard. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The inability to distinguish acceleration from causation of new cases would typically redound to the disadvantage of defendants that are making the doubling argument. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm by Juan Antunez
The non-interference directive is a reiteration of the general principle that, when one court is exercising in rem jurisdiction over a res, a second court will not assume in rem jurisdiction over the same res. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:42 pm
CMS's Interim Ruling and Proposed Rule differ in many important aspects from the Medicare Appeals Council's longstanding position articulated in In re: O'Connor Hosp., that hospitals are entitled to full Part B payment, including observation and underlying services, following a denial of Part A reimbursement and that any Part B payment is subject to the rules governing administrative finality and will not be time-barred. [read post]