Search for: "In Re Paoli"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am
Ioannidis, “The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses,” 94 Milbank Quarterly 485 (2016). [10] In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:31 am
Contents include:EditorialThijs Etty, Josephine van Zeben, Cinnamon Carlarne, Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli, Bruce Huber, & Anna Huggins, Legal, Regulatory, and Governance Innovation in Transnational Environmental Law Articles Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli, Re-imagining the Making of Climate Law and Policy in Citizens’ Assemblies Elizabeth Donger, Children and Youth in Strategic Climate Litigation: Advancing Rights through Legal Argument and Legal Mobilization Jocelyn… [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm
” In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am
Remarkably, despite the notoriety he had gained in the Philadelphia asbestos litigation, Shubin showed up in the high-profile Paoli Railroad PCB case, as an expert witness on causation.[20] In the Paoli case, Shubin gave rather unscientific testimony that conflated general and specific causation, and assumed that PCBs caused individual plaintiffs’ disease because PCBs can cause disease.[21] As far I can determine, he was never confronted with his perjuries from the… [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Fernandez Paoli. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:38 am
Black man in America, you’re supposed to keep what you feel inside right now. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 4:49 am
At a Pizza Hut in Paoli, Indiana, organizers and attendees of last year’s violent rally in Charlottesville described to me their visions of a white ethno-state. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
Thanks for checking in with us.Gallagher Law Group, PC Paoli, Pa 19301 610-647-5027 E-Mail Questions or Comments to : jag@johnagallagher.com [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
"They're elite? [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 10:26 pm
Pennington, took a look at me, smiled and said, "You're a little early, aren't you. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
Herlihy-Paoli) was not entitled to any compensation. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
See also In re Paoli Yard PCB Litigation, 35 F.3d 717, 761 n.31 (3d Cir. 1994) (same theory also not applicable to toxic tort cases) (applying Pennsylvania law).Increased risk-type theories have also been asserted, and rejected, in Pennslyvania federal district courts. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:37 am
Herlihy-Paoli received nothing. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
In re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 745 (3d Cir. 1994). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 5:06 pm
We’re excited to see what happens with him in the second half. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:54 pm
Thanks for checking in with us.Gallagher Law Group, PC Paoli, Pa 19301 610-647-5027 E-Mail Questions or Comments to : jag@johnagallagher.com [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
In re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 750 (3d Cir.1994) (Becker, J.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct.1253 (1995). [read post]
