Search for: "In Re Paoli"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am
Ioannidis, “The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses,” 94 Milbank Quarterly 485 (2016). [10] In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:42 am
That didn't bother me.' And that's when you know you're fine, and you can go out there every single day and not have to worry about it. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
Mayor of Paoli, Colorado, population 50. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
See In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
31 May 2010, 4:38 am
Monarchy had re-asserted itself. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litig., 916 F.2d 829, 850 (3d Cir. 1990), involved alleged PCB exposure. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
See In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Prods. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:44 am
”Id. at 77 n. 75; Ford II at 43; In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation, 916 F.2d 829, 852 (3rd Cir. 1990). [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:32 am
To determine which opinions do and do not, the court adopted the reasoning of the Third Circuit in In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation, 35 F.3d 717 (3d Cir.1994). [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:32 pm
See In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:57 am
(quoting In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm
” In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am
Remarkably, despite the notoriety he had gained in the Philadelphia asbestos litigation, Shubin showed up in the high-profile Paoli Railroad PCB case, as an expert witness on causation.[20] In the Paoli case, Shubin gave rather unscientific testimony that conflated general and specific causation, and assumed that PCBs caused individual plaintiffs’ disease because PCBs can cause disease.[21] As far I can determine, he was never confronted with his perjuries from the… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Use air conditioners only when you're home, and only in rooms you're using. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Fernandez Paoli. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:42 am
"They're elite? [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
(quoting In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Okla. 2007) PCBs In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
