Search for: "In Re Slater"
Results 21 - 40
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 2:47 pm
., Esther Slater McDonald, and Michael L. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Slater (9th Circuit April 23, 2018). [read post]
9 May 2018, 6:12 am
Well, if you’re interested in at least one of these questions, you’re in the right place. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Slater later included Naruto’s selfies in a book, crediting the monkey photographer for the work. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:22 pm
Malgré son caractère surréaliste, l’affaire inspire quelques réflexions sur le droit d’auteur. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Can Slater collect from Naruto? [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 10:13 am
See In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 990 (Fed. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am
.), health and healthcare law (Common Themes in Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect Cases presented by Shayna Slater, Esq. and Naloxone: The Antidote to the Opioid Epidemic? [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 2:19 am
Now such issues might re-surface with increasing frequency and relevance also in the area of copyright and, in doing so, test the scope of protection. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:56 pm
Schwartz, PC understands these kinds of cases, and we’re ready to give you a free, no-obligation consultation regarding your case. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
The Intimate Images and Cyber-protection Act is the result of a serious re-think of all the defects found in the Cyber-safety Act. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
If you think things are getting worse, you’re right. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
There are only 3 legal options with regards to the picture: the monkey has rights (which no court has ever declared); David Slater owns the copyright, or the picture is in the public domain, in which case everyone can use it and re-use it. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
In Craig v Slater, a proceeding heard recently over four weeks by Toogood J (sitting without a jury), two pre-trial decisions are of note. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:46 am
I realize I’m setting the bar low, but we’re dealing with business contracts, where dysfunction is the norm, so you can set the bar low and conceivably still be useful. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:29 pm
Slater are set for July 12, 2017, at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:19 am
Slater, Ms. [read post]
