Search for: "In Re the Dow Chemical Co" Results 41 - 60 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 6:12 am by Antitrust Today
The decision is a victory for defendants Dow Chemical Co., Union Carbide Corp., Rohm & Haas Co. and Arkema Inc., who argued that their economics expert had demonstrated flaws in the plaintiffs’ case showing that the announcements of price increases bore little or no relation to the actual prices paid by the purchasers. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:35 am
"There is no reason for the business community to be concerned" about Judge Sotomayor, said Lauren Rosenblum Goldman, a partner at Mayer Brown LLP who has represented businesses including Wachovia Corp. and Dow Chemical Co. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Lydia Zuraw
The herbicide is a combination of 2,4-D and glyphosate and is made by Dow AgroSciences. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 7:28 am by Russell Knight
Dow Chemical Co., 166 Ill. 2d 48, 63 (Ill. 1995) The purpose of threatening to bar a witness is to enforce proper compliance with discovery. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Dow Chemical Co., 484 U.S. 1004  (1988); see also In re “Agent Orange” Prod. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm by Barry Barnett
On February 26, Dow Chemical surrendered hope that the Court would review and then toss a $1.2 billion verdict and judgment. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dow Chemical Co., 30 N.Y.2d 143, 282 N.E.2d 288, 331 N.Y.S.2d 382 (1972), finding that the third-party complaint validly stated a claim for contribution.2 [*4] (See Short Form Order, LaMarca, J., 12/04/09). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 12:10 pm by Adam Levitin
Piccinin; but contrast In re Lyondell Chemical (granting only a temporary stay under section 105(a))). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:11 pm
  In Dow [Dow Chemical Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
Dow Chemical Co., 473 Mich. 63, 701 N.W.2d 684 (Mich. 2005). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Today we're going to speculate a bit about what might happen if we win. [read post]