Search for: "In re G.D."
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2024, 7:16 pm
In the case of In re Danna T., the Suffolk County Family Court deliberated over a petition filed by E.O., the maternal grandmother of G.D., seeking visitation rights. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
G.D Ravindran (Professor and Head, Family Medicine, St. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:02 pm
Justice Baltodano's opinion earlier today says, in part:"Father failed to appear for his court-ordered deposition. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
G.D. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
Reporting on lawsuits and criminal prosecutions is broadly protected against libel liability—but not when the outcome of those proceedings is omitted, and the reader is left hearing only about an indictment or conviction and not the acquittal or reversal. [1] For purposes of this article, it's enough to assume that I knowingly fail to mention this; but in principle I could be liable if I merely negligently fail to mention it, if you're a private figure and you can show that… [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
(If you're a public figure, assume I know that this is so.) [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:23 am
By G.D. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:28 am
., G.D. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:29 pm
” G.D. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:25 pm
G.D. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
It was a tough week for the talc litigation industry. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
G.D. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
G.D. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
The validity of the patent was sustained in a director-ordered re-exam. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
This time, we don’t care much about the peculiar facts, but rather we’re directing ourselves to the court’s odd reasoning that somehow there’s a conflict between the learned intermediary rule (adopted at some level now in everyAmerican jurisdiction – see our “headcount” post here − and the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (“UCATA”). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The primary track is the “official business, or topics of discourse”—the substance of what we want to say.12 A secondary, or collateral, track refers to the act of speaking itself: “to timing, delays, re-phrasings, mistakes, repairs, intentions to speak, and the like. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:02 pm
In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 14-5505, 2014 WL 2895939 (D.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
G.D. [read post]
