Search for: "In re P. C."
Results 21 - 40
of 5,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2010, 5:37 am
For example, suppose we are given two N-digit numbers, A and B, and a 2N-digit number C, and we're asked whether A times B equals C. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
This item in the Washington Free Bacon Beacon (oops, sorry), piqued my interest: "The insurance industry and ... lawmakers are attempting to water down a new Iran sanctions bill that would penalize any company that underwrites Iranian affiliates" Since this is rather outside my bailiwick, I turned (again) to our resident on-call P&C guru, Bill M, who helped me get my head around it. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
The Law Professor Blogs Network is thrilled to announce the launch/re-launch of four blogs: Business Law Prof Blog, by C. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
"Also: In re Etter, 756 F.2d 852, 857 n.5 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:09 pm
Nuremberg est un sujet inépuisable et des ouvrages ne cessent d'être publiés sur ce procès historique et hors normes, père de toutes les croyances en une humanité meilleure qui dit « Plus jamais ça ! [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm
A lot has happened since Monday night, when I posted a blog on the case which we now know as Re P (A Child). [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 1:26 pm
Dans cette espèce, la Cour a précisé qu'elle exemptait une fouille de l'exigence du warrant en pesant, d'un côté, le degré d'intrusion dans la sphère privée, et d'un autre côté, le degré de nécessité d'une exemption au regard de la promotion des intérêts publics légitimes. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:09 pm
D, on the other hand, is very well aware that a given legal theory requires elements A, B, C, and D to be established (every single one of them), and wishes to emphasize that by God P has done nothing to establish C (nothing! [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
For example:Case C‑136/02 P, Mag Instrument v OHIM used to be [2004] ECR I‑9165 but it's now EU:C:2004:592Case C‑25/05 P, Storck v OHIM used to be [2006] I-5719 but it's now EU:C:2006:422Case C‑106/03 P, Vedial v OHIM used to be [2004] ECR I-9573 but it's now EU:C:2004:611 He was a bit disconcerted by this, for a number of reasons, including these:He's not sure what happened to the old… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:20 pm
On September 6, 2011, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied summary judgment for vitamin C manufacturers in In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1738 (Decision (Vit C)). [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 12:28 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 21 October 2013 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 7:15 am
As usual when we consider the Property/Casualty side of the business, I turn to our P&C Guru, Bill M. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
La question cruciale était de savoir si le droit de priorité émanant de P avait été cédé au Titulaire. [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:28 am
Which seems a lot like traditional underwriting (just because you have diabetes doesn't mean you're going to lose a limb). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:05 am
CRAIG ROCHESTER, and ROY P. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 12:41 pm
Category: Administrative Appeals Opinions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: AC36562 - In re Matthew P. [read post]
30 May 2007, 2:57 pm
” William P. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
According to the Supreme Court's oral argument calendar notice, Justice Eileen C. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:33 am
They're tough questions. [read post]
