Search for: "In re Richard T. (1978)" Results 41 - 60 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2017, 12:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
These appointments are not subject to Senate confirmation.Brief biographies of these appointees are set out below:Appellate Division-First DepartmentHonorable Rolando T. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
After you graduated high school in 1978, you departed for bucolic Cambridge, MA, where you graduated with honors and joined Phi Beta Kappa. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 11:30 pm
If they aren’t complaining, it’s because they’re too busy worrying. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
For example, writing in the Boston Herald on October 16, Adriana Cohen notes that “[u]nder the American justice system you’re supposed to be innocent until proven guilty and every man and woman who is accused of committing a crime is supposed to be afforded the right to have their day in court—but that apparently doesn’t apply to Donald Trump. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am by MBettman
Dep’t of Natural Res., 62 Ohio St. 2d 138 (1980)( The purpose of the immunity is “to encourage owners of premises suitable for recreational pursuits to open their land to public use without worrying about liability. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
This year, government lawyers argued to the court that it couldn’t yet decide whether it could decide whether the government tapping into AT&T’s fiberoptic cables violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The first university case involving affirmative action was in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm by MBettman
Dep’t of Natural Res., 62 Ohio St. 2d 138 (1980)( The purpose of the immunity is “to encourage owners of premises suitable for recreational pursuits to open their land to public use without worrying about liability. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm by MBettman
In Ozkok, the BIA modified its precedent and established a three prong test for a conviction to be a conviction for immigration purposes: All three prongs had to be met: the judge or jury has found the alien guilty or he has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere or has admitted sufficient facts to warrant a finding of guilty;  The judge has ordered some form of punishment, penalty, or restraint on the person ‘s liberty to be imposed (including but not limited to incarceration,… [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:12 pm by Wells Bennett
 Senator Burr told MSNBC: Everybody needs to realize that this act expires on June 1st, the House is back in session on June 1st, so it’s not like they’re going to jam us on Thursday, leave town and make us believe that we can’t send them something else. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
 Congress can’t pretend that the Second Circuit's narrow reading of “relevant to an authorized investigation” doesn’t exist. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 4:36 am by SHG
  We treat lead paint eaters more harshly because we don’t care why they’re criminals. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
City of Los Angeles Dep’t of Water and Power v. [read post]