Search for: "In re SCHOOL DIST. NO. 26"
Results 1 - 20
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2006, 4:44 am
Vrain Valley School Dist. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
In re G.J.D., 2010-Ohio-2677 (11th Dist.) [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:39 pm
When they’re teaching, or counseling students, they are seen as speaking on behalf of the school, and the school has broad power to control its own speech. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
In re G.J.D., 2010-Ohio-2677 (11th Dist.) [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:48 pm
Dist., decided last week by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 1:46 pm
" So no impact on schools. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:45 am
Tri-Valley School Dist. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
There's some language along those lines as to the Fourth Amendment and sports teams in Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, subsequent correspondence with the school district revealed that petitioner did not advise the school district of his retirement, that such retirement was not processed through the school district's payroll system and that petitioner's sole appointment by [*2]the school district occurred when he began work as a substitute bus driver in June 2019, i.e., he was not reappointed to this position after July 26, 2019. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, subsequent correspondence with the school district revealed that petitioner did not advise the school district of his retirement, that such retirement was not processed through the school district's payroll system and that petitioner's sole appointment by [*2]the school district occurred when he began work as a substitute bus driver in June 2019, i.e., he was not reappointed to this position after July 26, 2019. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decision No. 18,422 (June 26, 2024) Girvin & Ferlazzo, PC, attorneys for respondent, Ryan P. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Decision No. 18,422 (June 26, 2024) Girvin & Ferlazzo, PC, attorneys for respondent, Ryan P. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:58 pm
On appeal Ragland has not argued that Thompson's communications were vulgar, as in Bethel School Dist. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm
Dist. 53, 100 F. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
School-Link Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:37 pm
Dist. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Supp. 374, 412, 425-26 (D. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
"[9] The Second District weighed in on this exact issue in In re Marriage of Mates, 156 IllApp3d 26 (2nd Dist 1987).[10] In Mates, the wife filed her petition after residing in Illinois for only one month. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484 [1st Dept 2015]; Matter of Brown v City of New York, 111 AD3d 426 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]