Search for: "Industrial Association v. United States"
Results 361 - 380
of 3,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
See Voda v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:10 am
The confederation, which includes the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, National Retail Federation, National Association of Manufacturers, National Federation of Independent Business and HR Policy Association, urges the D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:10 am
The confederation, which includes the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Coalition for a Democratic Workplace, National Retail Federation, National Association of Manufacturers, National Federation of Independent Business and HR Policy Association, urges the D.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
The Branch Consultants v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:22 pm
Ben Golant, the Copyright Office’s assistant general counsel, asked whether AT&T, the exclusive provider for the iPhone in the United States, “prohibits you from implementing certain applications? [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
Just over a week ago, the United States proposed tariffs on over 1,000 Chinese imports in response to various intellectual property grievances. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
By all indications, the Court’s decision in Murphy is a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
Following the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:00 pm
Heidi participated in the seminal United States Supreme Court case, Pioneer v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:34 am
The opinion demonstrated a general skepticism of the telecom industry claims, and with classic Scalia snark, he couldn’t resist this footnote about the petitioners, “CTIA—The Wireless Association”: This is not a typographical error. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:37 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:13 am
Facts: This case (Naz, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
“In a post Roe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The United States solicitor general represents the federal government before the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:30 am
Sexual harassment is recognized as a form of unlawful sexual harassment throughout the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
First, some initial points: Officers of the United States — defined as those who exercise significant authority of the United States — have to have sworn an oath and received a commission from the President. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
References: American Public Health Association, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
