Search for: "Jonathan David Burns"
Results 21 - 40
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2016, 7:38 am
Political System Is Flawed but Not Corrupt” by Stephen Medvic for Washington Post “New Questions Emerge about Bentley’s Vegas Trip, Republican Governors Association’s Influence” by Connor Sheets for AL.com Elections “Bernie Sanders’s Online Foot Soldiers Weigh Their Next Campaign” by Jonathan Mahler and Nick Corasaniti for New York Times [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:54 pm
- Illinois attorney Jonathan Rosenfeld of Strellis & Field in the firm's Nursing Homes Abuse Blog [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 6:01 am
Silk, and David B. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Black, where the Court upheld the major portions of a Virginia statute making intimidating cross burning illegal. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:31 am
David Dawsey describes a patent which covers a rather complex method for determining the proper length of a golf club. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Burns, A THEORY OF THE TRIAL (1999)David T. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:10 am
Pam Brannon Jonathan Strange & Mr. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
I cannot translate Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom into Italian – copyright restricts my freedom to speak. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:28 pm
Is David Cameron the luckiest man alive, or what ? [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Similarly, a law that explicitly makes it a crime to burn a flag “in order to show contempt” for it, but that does not prohibit burning as a means of respectfully disposing of a damaged flag, would be viewpoint-based. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 10:27 am
Slash-and-burn protests and quixotic ideological crusades are luxuries they can’t afford. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
United States, the draft card burning case, the test is similar but somewhat different: the law must further an important or substantial governmental interest unrelated to the suppression of free expression, and the incidental restriction on alleged First Amendment freedom is no greater than is essential to that interest. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
" One of the panel members -- I think it was David Cole or Jonathan Turley -- said that the Bush II administration's anti-terrorism campaign includes efforts to chill SUSPECTED terrorists. [read post]
14 May 2023, 12:19 am
” Of altars… Further to our post They bury (and burn) altars, don’t they? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Johnson case invalidating a law prohibiting flag-burning rightly rejected that idea. [read post]
29 May 2021, 6:41 am
Jonathan Shaub argued that the agreement is a considerable institutional defeat for Congress and that it advances a sweeping view of executive privilege. [read post]
