Search for: "Kelly v. State Bar (1991)"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
” Kelly’s other death penalty cases were Winfied v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
The petition in Kelly v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Pa. 1988) (Kelly, R., J.) [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Statewide Healthcare Service, Inc., 585 So.2d 778 (Miss. 1991); Hewett v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am
Pa. 1988) (Kelly, R., J.) [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 78 NY2d 207, 216-217 [1991]; Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143, 147 [1974]).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_01252.htm [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
State, 591 So. 2d 911 (1991) ......................... 4 Kyles v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Kelly said Monday that Coach Joe Paterno was a witness for the grand jury and faces no charges. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
” from a post by Kelly Laycock.The logic and style of the arguments about patent examiners is indeed incomprehensible.Perhaps "patenthawk" should include law review articles, in addition to court decisions, within his scope; from a recent post on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Lemons, 941 F.2d 309, 316 & 316 n.3 (5th Cir. 1991) (“must place banks at risk of loss”); United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
In Lexington Land Development, L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
In Lexington Land Development, L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
In Lexington Land Development, L.L.C. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
In Lexington Land Development, L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
Toole v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
” The bar for originality is low; it requires only a “modicum of creativity. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
