Search for: "Kumho"
Results 21 - 40
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 7:00 pm
On the other hand, the meaning of Kumho is critical to the case and cited frequently by both parties. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 7:36 am
Kumho Tire, supra, at 140. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:50 pm
Then in 2006 Korea Kumho Petrochemical Co., Ltd. filed a complaint against defendant Flexsys America L.P., its affiliate Flexsys N.V., and others, alleging that defendants engaged in unlawful conduct to exclude Kumho from the U.S. rubber chemicals market. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm
Plaintiff Network-1 moved to exclude certain opinions of expert Ambreen Salters, as unreliable.However, to the extent Plaintiff disagrees with the accuracy of Salters's decision to treat the fluctuating numbers in the spreadsheet as variable costs, or her decision to be conservative by treating only 50% of the operating costs as variable based on Thompson's deposition testimony, these concerns are best addressed through vigorous cross examination at trial, not wholesale exclusion. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:17 am
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997), and Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:31 am
Insurance companies hate that sort of thing, but under the language of Daubert and Kumho Tire, the appeals court correctly decided that the credibility of the data was an issue for the jury. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:16 am
Kumho Tire, 526 U.S. at 150. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:52 pm
Daubert and Kumho Tire have been criticized on the ground that they require too much scientific training on the part of judges. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:35 am
., and Kumho Tire Co., v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 6:37 am
I replaced the Bridgestone Potenzas that were original equipment with Kumho Ecsta SPT tires of the same size. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:40 am
Any interpretation of Daubert, Kumho Tire, or the 1997 Joiner case that conflicts with the subsequent statute, Rule 702, is legally incorrect. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
., Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:34 am
(For that matter, Kumho was decided by the Supreme Court in 1999, so Kilpatrick couldn’t have been distilled from that, either; this is especially ironic because Kumho overruled an Eleventh Circuit opinion, which should have been a hint ot the Eleventh Circuit that it shouldn’t be relying on its earlier precedents). [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
Id. at *2 (quoting Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 7:53 am
” Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:54 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:54 am
Hutchinson "This eighth book in the best-selling monograph series offers a complete update of Monograph No. 6 focusing entirely on state and federal court expert evidence issues, including the Daubert-Joiner-Kumho Tire trilogy. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:53 pm
Testimony about the connection between a religious icon and drug trafficking was improper under Daubert and Kumho. [read post]
