Search for: "Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael"
Results 21 - 40
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593 (1993) (specifying the “the known or potential rate of error” as one of several factors in assessing the scientific reliability or validity of proffered expert witness’s opinion) Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:26 am
" Hicks, 389 F.3d at 524; see also Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:16 am
Although Daubert addressed scientific evidence, the Supreme Court in Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:57 pm
Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:20 pm
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
General Electric Co. and Kumho Tire v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 5:10 am
From United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:30 am
See Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am
Id. at *2 (quoting Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
” Later, in Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm
” Later, in Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:09 am
’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:17 am
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997), and Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:26 am
Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am
Springstead then pointed out that the legal standard courts apply to the admissibility of expert testimony comes from the Supreme Court’s decisions in Kumho Tire Co. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Daubert v.Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 589–90 (1993);Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 5:07 am
” Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:24 pm
” Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:05 am
In patent cases, the district court has "a special obligation to 'ensure that any and all scientific testimony. . .is not only relevant, but reliable.'" Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
