Search for: "LAMBERT v. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
 The main claim at issue is a Swiss form claim, and although this is significant for the present case, much less turns on it than in the other saga ongoing at the moment of Warner Lambert v Actavis (latest instalment here). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, as the instant action is based upon a fraudulent scheme, the doctrine of res judicata would not bar plaintiffs from seeking to recover damages in this action (see Lambert v Sklar, 61 AD3d 939 [2d Dept. 2009]). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
According to the Complaint, Stuart and Lambert `were charged and convicted of Offenses against Computer Uses, Prohibition of Lewd Acts and Theft. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm by Sex Crimes
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:07 pm by cdw
The Valentine’s week’s edition is now available: Leading off this week is the Third Circuit’s ruling in James Lambert v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
Rejecting all four grounds, he confirmed that the Court of Appeal is bound by the majority judgment in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (the Supreme Court’s decision in the pregabalin case). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
Today, in a four to four split decision, with Chief Justice Roberts not participating, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Second Circuit in Warner Lambert v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 8:58 am
The Supreme Court recently granted a petition for certiorari to review a Second Circuit decision holding that the FDA approval process does not preempt certain state common law claims.The Second Circuit decision, Desiano v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
While this moggy was struggling to get back from Indonesia, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the pregabalin appeal Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 October 2016), and finally the IPKat has managed to blog about it (the lateness by no means reflecting on the importance of the judgment).It is very much a judgment of three halves.In the first part of the judgment (up to [135]), which substantively… [read post]