Search for: "Lambert v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
 The main claim at issue is a Swiss form claim, and although this is significant for the present case, much less turns on it than in the other saga ongoing at the moment of Warner Lambert v Actavis (latest instalment here). [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, as the instant action is based upon a fraudulent scheme, the doctrine of res judicata would not bar plaintiffs from seeking to recover damages in this action (see Lambert v Sklar, 61 AD3d 939 [2d Dept. 2009]). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
According to the Complaint, Stuart and Lambert `were charged and convicted of Offenses against Computer Uses, Prohibition of Lewd Acts and Theft. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm by Sex Crimes
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:07 pm by cdw
The Valentine’s week’s edition is now available: Leading off this week is the Third Circuit’s ruling in James Lambert v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
Rejecting all four grounds, he confirmed that the Court of Appeal is bound by the majority judgment in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (the Supreme Court’s decision in the pregabalin case). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
Today, in a four to four split decision, with Chief Justice Roberts not participating, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Second Circuit in Warner Lambert v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 8:58 am
The Supreme Court recently granted a petition for certiorari to review a Second Circuit decision holding that the FDA approval process does not preempt certain state common law claims.The Second Circuit decision, Desiano v. [read post]