Search for: "Lee v. Small Claims Court" Results 101 - 120 of 371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in such situations, the Court has already unanimously rejected claims for religious exemptions, in cases such as Lee and Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am by Marty Lederman
  To the contrary, the Court has rejected exactly such arguments in cases such as Lee (see 455 U.S. at 260-61) and Gillette. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Saini J has dismissed the claims in libel, slander per se and malicious falsehood in George v Cannell & another. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The relevant Sawyer/Man claims were found indefinite, and the Supreme Court never explicitly established priority of invention. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It’s an amazing place, with one small, but important flaw: none of the clocks seem to work. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 9:00 pm
Granted that Justices Stevens and Ginsburg dissented, but that is small comfort for the losing party, nor the huge attorneys' fees likely paid for this case to wend its way from the Court of Federal Claims to the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am by Ashwin Varma
In this part, I take a much deeper dive into the economic literature to determine whether the FTC’s theory of harm is likely to hold up in court and whether the commission has picked the right forum in which to bring its claims. [read post]