Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley" Results 21 - 40 of 614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Trademark Extraterritoriality: Abitron v. Hetronic Doesn’t Go the Distance (Guest Blog Post)
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
SLS Faculty Weigh In on Recent SCOTUS Decisions in Roundup of the 2022-2023 Term
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
Biden v. [read post]
Legal Aggregate - https://law.stanford.edu/legal-aggregate/
Reevaluating Design Patent Obviousness
30 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Does KSR International Co. v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
Ad Briefs: Covering Your Ads - http://www.coveringyourads.com/
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[4] Justice Thomas asked a number of hypotheticals and questioned whether Rogers v. [read post]
Art Law Gallery - https://www.artlawgallery.com/
Why the Court Should Dismiss the Most Important Case of the Year (Moore v Harper).
16 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
We affirm the three-judge panel’s Harper v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Biweekly FTC Roundup: But Wait, There’s More Edition
21 Apr 2023, 8:16 am by Daniel J. Gilman
And in West Virginia v. [read post]
Truth on the Market - http://truthonthemarket.com/
Federal Circuit Narrows Scope for Copyrighting Software Function
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
  SAS Inst. v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Court concerned about scope of patent covering millions of antibodies
29 Mar 2023, 12:09 pm by Eric M. Fraser
ShareDuring oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Reply to the Dream Team: The Critically Constructive Pathways of Building Equality Machines, by Orly Lobel
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
As Mark Lemley writes, AIs have to show their work. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
Fourteenth Trademark Scholars' Roundtable, part 3 (Evidence)
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Fourteenth Trademark Scholars Roundtable, part 2
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Lemley: his instinct is for standards so that they adapt, but he gets that people have different preferences. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Fourteenth Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable: Are Key Trademark and Unfair Competition Doctrines Anachronistic?
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
LTTB v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Lemley & McKenna: Trademark Spaces
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am by Camilla Hrdy
 Compare LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
Written Description - http://writtendescription.blogspot.com/
WIPIP: In Memoriam and Fair Use
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cariou v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
WIPIP Concurrent Session #3: Copyright Doctrine
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In 2016, Leonard v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
WIPIP: Innovation Theory & TM
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Victoria’s Secret v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
WIPIP, Concurrent Session #1, Design
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A far cry from Sears v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Mark Lemley loses at CAFC; the intersection of KSR and design patents
30 Jan 2023, 1:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome of the case was that LKQ (represented by Mark Lemley; MARK A. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/