Search for: "Ling v. Bell" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick,… [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
But as the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
Regulating rishvat in early colonial India”·         Elizabeth Lhost, University of Chicago, “Philatelic Fraud and the Materiality of Law: Policing stamped paper in British India”·         Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Corruption and Forensic Experts in late colonial India·         Simanti Dasgupta, University of… [read post]