Search for: "Live Nation Entertainment, Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 4:44 am by briadm
She named as defendants Aragon Entertainment Center Inc., Live Nation Worldwide, Live Nation UTours (U.S.A) Inc., Live Nation Chicago Inc., Live Nation LGTours (U.S.A) LLC and Live Nation Marketing Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:44 am by briadm
She named as defendants Aragon Entertainment Center Inc., Live Nation Worldwide, Live Nation UTours (U.S.A) Inc., Live Nation Chicago Inc., Live Nation LGTours (U.S.A) LLC and Live Nation Marketing Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 2:10 pm by Heather Cobun
A federal judge’s ruling that Live Nation Entertainment Inc. is not a monopoly has been upheld by the 4th U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The rules for summary trial (see Rule 216) also allow the Court to issue orders requiring experts or witnesses to be cross-examined live at the hearing. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:26 pm by Ron Coleman
Rights Law § 50] protects the name, portrait, or picture of a “living person,” not a character created or a role performed by a living person. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Torres was the executive director of Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society in California, and the San Juan Bay National Estuary Program in Puerto Rico. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
 And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Arnstein was in the image of Frank’s fact skepticism and we still live with it despite the death of the distrust of district judges. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
After all, nearly all of us are indebted to search engines, and our lives would be considerably more difficult without them. [read post]
Mathew’s bio on the webinar webpage succinctly describes who he is and what he does: An Australian-qualified entertainment lawyer with more than 20 years’ experience, Mathew has lived in Beijing since 2009. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
National/international media studies educator. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
PCCM’s NOW TV service was known by a substantial number of Chinese speakers in the UK through their exposure to the mark if they visited or lived in Hong Kong, through free online services available in the UK from PPCM’s Hong Kong website, as well via in-flight entertainment on international flights to the UK. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am by Ben
Escape Media Group Inc et al).In Russia, owners of 'pirate' sites have been given a final warning by the government. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
National judges should not apply it, says Prof Jan Rosen" (here), which Eleonora published last week. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
 Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in cases G 2/12… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
 Never too late 39 [week ending Sunday 29 March] – Merpel writes to the EPO AC | CJEU and hyperlinks | New gTLD regime | AG on TM reputation and genuine use in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | AMBA speaks | Digital exhaustion | CJEU on linking to live shows in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment| EPO Enlarged Board on amendments’ clarity in G 3/14 | EPO on patentability in cases G 2/12… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
BVBA, a decision where the General Court of the European Union addressed the issue of whether and to what extent OHIM is bound to comply with earlier res judicata decisions of national Courts.* Litigation with friends: a Scramble for Scrabble in the Court of AppealFormer guest Kat Darren Meale is back to treat us to his account of JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290 [on which see the earlier Katpost here],… [read post]