Search for: "Loftis v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
United States, a challenge by two Maine men to their convictions for possession of a firearm after a domestic violence conviction. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm
Why did the Supreme Court decide to take Fisher v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
Authorities say they are using an approach that evidence shows is the best way to accomplish their lofty goals. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:40 am
But this lofty hope has proven illusory. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm
What is the point of all of the deliberation and debate (with examples and counterexamples, asserted and denied), and the crafting and drafting and redrafting of constitutional provisions, if those provisions will shortly be interpreted in terms of lofty principles with implications (to be enforced, by judges, against democratic majorities) that the enactors never intended, imagined, or desired? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
The primary intent of the speech is not some lofty public good, but merely establishing that his employer was wrong in firing him. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm
(D.I. 535)Footnote 6 is relevant to Teva v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:40 am
Even the non-terrorism Supreme Court case Steve cites as evidence of a greater judicial willingness to confer constitutional protections on non-citizens in the United States—Zadvydas v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In the background, however, lurked less lofty motivations. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
A state school like in Pennsylvania can cost less than $20,000 per year. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas Judge Lesa Gelb spoke of the issue in the case of Mangan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
We take its lofty status for granted. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am
Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 3:21 am
Despite its lofty terminology, the “matter of public concern” inquiry does not require that speech relate to an issue of exceptional significance in order to be entitled to prima facie First Amendment protection. [read post]
