Search for: "Long v. Murray et al" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
" Interestingly, Barbour et al. apparently did not file a reply brief. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Yaqoob Khan Bangash, ‘Constructing the state: Constitutional integration of the princely states of Pakistan’ in Long et al, State and Nation-Building in Pakistan (2015) 96-97; Akbar S. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
Med. 1196, 1196 (1993)(“If you torture the data long enough, they will confess. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY reference room (level 2): KE5015 .M84 2015Gus Van Harten et al., Administrative Law: Cases, Text, and Materials, 7th ed. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Ministers have been accused of “turning off the headlights at the first sign of dawn” after scrapping nationwide Covid surveillance programmes, with scientists saying it will almost certainly end up costing more money in the long run, the Guardian reports. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
”8 These tactics were largely effective: because of the lawsuits, the New York Times pulled its Alabama reporter for several years, sharply limiting its original reporting on events there.9 Both NYT v Sullivan and Abernathy et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm by Emily Coward
Murray, 476 U.S. 28 (1986) (plurality), and in cases where “racial issues [are] inextricably bound up with the conduct of the trial,” Ristaino v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
On 24 January 2023, Tipples J handed down a long awaited judgment in respect of the preliminary issues in the case of BW Legal Services Ltd v Trustpilot A/S [2023] EWHC 6 (KB). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am by Brannon Denning
A case study, or even data gleaned from briefs filed in school speech cases, would have been helpful to a reader seeking to gauge the size of the costs schools bear as a result of Tinker et al. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health Care Ltd and Dr Tony Romero v… [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The changes broaden the legal definition of ‘serious disruption’ allowing police to shut down protests before chaos erupts and consider the total impact of a series of protests by the same group and long-running campaigns, rather than treating them as stand-alone incidents. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies The long awaited Statement in Open Court in the case of Murray v Associated Newspapers was finally made on 21 May 2015. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
It ends with a consideration of key trends and developments going forward.COURSE CONCEPT STATEMENT:Two questions dominated a century-long debate about the economic, social, and political role of economic actors operating in corporate form: Whom must corporations serve and to what extent should the regulation of corporations be left to the market, to private ordering (contract law) among corporate stakeholders, or to public regulation by the state? [read post]