Search for: "Louisiana v. Hodge"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
An issue has recently been addressed in the courts of another State that no longer arises in Florida, whether it is possible for parents to have joint custody or for there to be “co-domicilliary” parents — the phrase used in the litigation in Louisiana where this recent case arose, Hodges v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:20 am
The Citizen’s Guide to the Supreme Court has a podcast on Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm
Hodges recognizing same-sex marriage as a right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Hodges, 659 So.2d 482, 485 (Fla. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
See Orr v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
On King v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Some states, but far from all, passed a variety of legislation (or in the case of Louisiana, Gov. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:20 am
Hodges. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges will likely come to be seen as a landmark of the constitutional landscape. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:01 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am
He successfully defended Louisiana’s marriage laws in Robicheaux v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:39 am
Hodges in which the Court is expected to address the constitutionality of same sex marriage bans. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:58 am
Valerie Hodges, R-Denham Springs. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:06 am
Hodges likely will expedite and shape the outcome of the Texas court’s final ruling. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
Hodges likely will expedite and shape the outcome of the Texas court’s final ruling. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Hodges likely will expedite and shape the outcome of the Texas court’s final ruling. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Hodges likely will expedite and shape the outcome of the Texas court’s final ruling. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:52 am
Hodges likely will expedite and shape the outcome of the Texas court’s final ruling. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
See order in Texas v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
While Windsor held that Congress’ power to define marriage was limited, the federal circuits are currently split regarding whether principles of individual rights or of federalism ground the Windsor opinion, and this very question is currently pending before the Supreme Court in Obergefell v Hodges (Dkt No 14-556). [read post]
