Search for: "Low v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 61 - 80
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
Clair Co, etc). [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
” ChatGPT states that it requires the following source type information for it to generate a citation that adheres to the McGill Guide: Case law: Case name (including v. for “versus” if applicable) Volume number and abbreviated title of the law report series Page number where the case begins Year of the decision Court name and jurisdiction Legislation (statutes, regulations, etc.): Full title of the statute or regulation (italicized or underlined)… [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:34 pm
On Thursday evening local time, Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
Burford v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:15 am
Atari Games Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The District Court for the Northern District of Georgia dismissed the FTC’s complaint for failure to state a claim, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 11:07 pm
A spokeswoman for the Landgericht München I (Munich I Regional Court) has just confirmed to me that Volkswagen will have to defend itself in that court on November 10, 2022, against patent infringement case no. 7 O 16858/2 (Presiding Judge: Dr. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:06 pm
The district court thus did not err in finding that the “obviousness of [the] risk” meant that Reiche was subjectively aware of the risk presented by her conduct. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
Richard Lowe, Defendant-Appellant.2008 WL 1822421(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
The district court adopted the holding and logic of Martinez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
These funds tend to select reorganization deals where controlling shareholders have incentives to keep prices low and the consideration for minority shareholders merger price is believed to be too low. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:40 am
Geren, Secretary of the Army, et al., etc. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 2:31 pm
In contrast to this, in the US case of Bridgeman Art Library v Corel Corp [1999], the District Court of the Southern District of New York sought to apply UK law to the subject of photographs of classic works of art, and came to the opposite conclusion, namely that copyright did not subsist in mere photographic reproductions. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
Introduction This is Part III in a series of posts on the relationship between the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:58 am
The case is Ray v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 2:13 am
While People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] True Religion v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 11:00 am
Maybe it was the store with the lowest prices, and the person lives on a low income. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 11:30 pm
Both the federal district court and the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:30 am
Check all low areas (basements, sumps, etc.) for vapor before entering. [read post]