Search for: "Lowe v. Peters et al" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2014, 7:14 am by Docket Navigator
Capstone Photography, Inc. et al, 2-13-cv-09573 (CACD October 28, 2014, Order) (Snyder, J.) [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
Given the composition of this working group, no one was surprised by its finding: “The Working Group noted that a causal association between exposure to asbestos and cancer of the ovary was clearly established, based on five strongly positive cohort mortality studies of women with heavy occupational exposure to asbestos (Acheson et al., 1982; Wignall & Fox, 1982; Germani et al., 1999; Berry et al., 2000; Magnani et… [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
Read… I am no expert in sentencing, probation, rehabilitation of offenders et al… but…surely.. we can, as a vaguely civilised nation.. do a bit better than this? [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:26 am by admin
Foon, Robert Peter Gale, et al., Immunologic Approaches to the Classification and Management of Lymphomas and Leukemias (1988); Eric Lax & Robert Peter Gale, Radiation: What It Is, What You Need to Know (2013). [2] Byrd v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm by Schachtman
” Jonathan Samet, et al., eds., Institute of Medicine Review of Asbestos: Selected Cancers (2006).[1] The Institute of Medicine’s monograph has fostered a more circumspect approach in some of the federal agencies. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:43 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
We now have one of the first cases interpreting the new legislation, Parekh et al v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:43 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
We now have one of the first cases interpreting the new legislation, Parekh et al v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Wilhem von Leeb et al., Judgment, XI Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals 690-95, while Schlegelberger's is in the better-known Justice Case.)This may sound like ancient history, but it seems significant that in the past the U.S. threw the book at government lawyers for conduct that is awfully close to the allegations in this lawsuit.3. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
Using data gathered by the university, Arcidiacono et al found that this narrowing was illusory. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:14 pm
The ruling was made on January 18, 2008 in the matter Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
Its three central features describe the essence of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: destruction of red blood cells (hemolytic anemia), destruction of platelets (those blood cells responsible for clotting, resulting in low platelet counts, or thrombocytopenia), and acute renal failure. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US: AIPLA urges Federal Circuit not to proscribe patents for biomedical diagnostic tools: Prometheus v Mayo (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Lovenox (Enoxaparin) – US: Aventis files for certiorari: challenging Federal Circuit’s low standard for intent to deceive in… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]