Search for: "M. Fisher e.g"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
See, e.g., Zango, 568 F.3d at 1178 (Fisher, J., concurring); Berin Szoka & Ashkhen Kazaryan, Section 230: An Introduction for Antitrust & Consumer Protection Practitioners, GLOB. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:23 am
See, e.g. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Cramer, because I’m going to look to you to make proper decisions, is that Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
See, e.g., Goodbar v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
In part, the amici correctly identified the experimental milieu in which Fisher worked, but the description of Fisher’s work is neither accurate nor fair. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
I am already wielding this judgment, both in headline and in nuance, and I’m sure the same is true of all of us. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:02 am
M. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
In a study of 257 mediations at Community Justice Centers in Australia, Fisher and Long found lower rates of agreement in those cases where disputants had been matched with mediators of similar backgrounds than when no attempt at matching was made.13 The Gambian data also underline the potential limitations of matching an African disputant to an African mediator. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:51 pm
See, e.g., Paragon Podiatry Lab, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
Now, for X herself, good law might be of no use if, e.g., Ms. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm
” So, after 50 years of doing this stuff, I’m confused and because I’m a generous guy, I’d like to share my confusion. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
I'm not an expert on the subject, and don't have an expert opinion. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In Puckett, the Court restated the rule from Olano, and then analyzed the government’s breach of a plea-agreement term and noted that “[t]he defendant whose plea agreement has been broken by the Government will not always be able to show prejudice, either because he obtained the benefits contemplated by the deal anyway ( e.g., the sentence that the prosecutor promised to request) or because he likely would not have obtained those benefits in any event (as is seemingly the… [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
It is also a great lesson in record keeping in the current environment of digital records.Though the extent and application of the normative choices made by Chancellor Strine may be questioned, and strongly (e.g., Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
The rate can be fixed at a set price (e.g. a 2% fixed rate) or set by a rate-setting entity. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:01 am
James M. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
James M. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
Crawford does not define the term "testimonial" or otherwise set forth a bright-line test for determining whether a statement is "testimonial" or not, e.g., id. at 68 ("We leave for another day any effort to spell out a comprehensive definition of 'testimonial.'".), Justice Scalia observed generally that "[t]estimony [...] is typically '[a] solemn declaration or affirmation made for the purpose of establishing or proving some fact.' An… [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
By Chris Sagers[1] In the world there are weightier things than antitrust, and the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh involves many of them. [read post]
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
That guidance says that “[a]n employer may not refuse to treat a pregnant worker the same as other employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work by relying on a policy that makes distinctions based on the source of an employee’s limitations (e.g., a policy of providing light duty only to workers injured on the job). [read post]
